Plagiarism Report of the Video 4

 Yes, the first video (Motivaan Stories) appears to be a derivative or "plagiarized" version of the second video (APPLEBOX By Sabari).

Based on the timelines and content, here is the breakdown of why the first is likely copied from the second:

1. Publication Timeline

  • APPLEBOX By Sabari: Published in October 2025.

  • Motivaan Stories: Published in February 2026. Since the content is nearly identical in its core structure, the earlier video is the original source.

2. Identical Plot Points & Structure

The first video follows the exact "Three Tasks" framework established in the Applebox video:

  • The Premise: A master thief visits a town where no one can be cheated and talks to a mystical tree.

  • Task 1 (The Merchant): Trying to use flattery to get a discount. In both videos, the thief fails because the merchant prioritizes business over praise.

  • Task 2 (The Rich Man): Trying to create urgency by selling a common stone as a rare gem. In both, the thief fails because the target stays calm and asks too many questions.

  • Task 3 (The Grieving Person): Trying to exploit vulnerability after a betrayal. In both, the thief fails because the person refuses to rush into a new relationship/friendship.

3. Moral Conclusions

The core message—that people who avoid flattery, stay calm/ask questions, and don't rush into new bonds after trauma are "un-cheatable"—is the unique intellectual backbone of the Applebox video, which the Motivaan Stories video mirrors exactly.

The Differences (The "Cover-Up")

The Motivaan Stories video adds a "Part 2" to the story where the thief becomes a spy and learns a "fourth lesson" about betrayal from close ones. This is a common tactic used when spinning someone else's content: keeping the core "viral" structure but adding extra fluff to make it look original or longer.

Conclusion: The first video is a clear retelling of your original script and concept.

Comments